Category: Income Tax
There was no delay in filing appeal before CIT(A) as CPC intimation u/s 143(1) received on email after 30 days – ITAT In a recent judgment, ITAT Cochin has held that there was no delay in filing of appeal by assessee as CPC email of intimation u/s 143(1) …
CBDT issues clarification on applicability of DTVSVS-2024 in cases time for filing appeal was available MINISTRY OF FINANCE(Department Of Revenue)(CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES) Order No. 8/2025 New Delhi, the 20th January, 2025 S.O. 348(E).—WHEREAS, the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 was introduced vide the Finance …
Commissioner cannot exercise jurisdiction under section 263 of the Act, when assessment has been made after obtaining approval of the Range Head In a recent judgment, ITAT Lucknow quashed revisionary order u/s 263 confirming that Commissioner cannot exercise jurisdiction under section 263 when assessment has been made after …
Order passed under Section 148A(d) quashed as it incorrectly mentioned that no reply was filed by the assessee. In a recent judgment, Rajasthan High Court quashed  order passed under Section 148A(d) as it incorrectly mentioned that no reply was filed by the assessee whereas reply was duly uploaded …
No Revision u/s 263 when AO after careful examination and detail enquiry took a plausible view that the provisions of section 115BBE of the Act are not applicable. In a recent judgment, ITAT Amritsar held that where the Assessing Officer (AO) after careful examination of the submissions made …
Penalty / Late Fee u/s 234E confirmed for delay in filing Form 26QB for TDS voluntarily deducted u/s 194IA on purchase of property though it was an agricultural land In a recent judgment, ITAT Ahmedabad confirmed penalty / Late fee u/s 234E for delay in filing TDS return …
High Court penalised Assessing Officer to pay cost of Rs. 50000/- to assessee for unnecessary harassment during the course of re-assesment proceedings u/s 148A(d) In a recent judgment, a division bench of the Hon’ble Jharkhand High Court directed AO to pay cost of Rs. 50000/- for unnecessary harassment …
No penalty u/s 270A when disallowances were mentioned in Tax Audit Report but assessee by mistake not added it back to the total income. In a recent judgment, the ITAT Pune held that no penalty u/s 270A can be levied when disallowances u/s 43B were mentioned in Tax …
Re-opening u/s 148 on incorrect facts assuming that assessee does not have PAN and he did not file any of his return quashed as invalid In a recent judgment, ITAT Delhi has held that AO had invoked jurisdiction for reopening assessment u/s 147/148 on basis of incorrect facts …
Reasons assigned for explaining the condonation of delay are to be construed with a justice oriented approach – ITAT In a recent judgment, ITAT Chandigarh condoned the delay in filing appeal before CIT(A) due to mistake of counsel observing that Courts are unanimous in their approach to propound …
