Category: Judgments
AO not being an expert of accounts, having regard to complexity of business of the assesse was duty bound to invoke & direct a special audit u/s 142(2A) of the Act. In a recent judgment ITAT Panji has set aside assessment making ad hoc estimation of gross profits …
Seller is not responsible for verification of Form 27C for obtaining goods without Collection of Tax at Source if it is duly filed in and signed by the declarant and forwarded within the prescribed time limit In a recent judgment, the Hon’ble Jharkhand High Court has declined to …
TCS provisions are not applicable to timber being sized, sawn into logs of different dimensions and shapes in activities carried on saw mills authorised by the Government. In a recent order, the Hon’ble Supreme Court dismissed the SLP of the Income Tax Department against the judgment of the …
Addition deleted for contingent liability stated in tax audit report but which was not debited to the P&L Account In a recent judgment, ITAT Kolkata upheld the order of CIT(A) deleting the addition made by CPC for contingent liability stated in tax audit report but which was not …
Mere failure of partner to respond to notice u/s 133(6) does not ipso facto establish that the capital is unexplained – ITAT upheld deletion of addition u/s 68 In recent case, ITAT Ahmedabad has upheld that the failure of the partner to respond to a notice under section …
Why cannot be the date of submission of reply and the date of personal hearing be the same, we are not aware of any such law – Allahabad High Court In a recent judgment, Hon’ble Allahabad High Court has dismissed the Petition of the assessee against the GST …
Even if no response is filed by assessee to notices u/s 61 and 73 of GST Act, it was incumbent on the Department to pass an order in compliance of provisions of Section 75(6) of the Act In a recent judgment, Hon’ble Allahabad High Court quashed order passed …
Assessee did not challenge order u/s 148A(d) and participated in the re-assessment proceedings – High Court declined to interfere In a recent judgment, Rajasthan High Court declined to interfere with re-assessment proceedings as the assessee did not challenge the order under section 148A(d) and participated in the re-assessment …
High Court condoned delay in filing Audit Report in Form 10B as the change in dates in filing audit report before return had caused confusion. In a recent judgment, Kerala High Court condoned the delay in filing Audit Report in Form 10B as the change in dates in …
Addition u/s 68 for corpus donation received from struck off companies – SLP dismissed In a recent judgment, Hon’ble Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition (SLP) of the assessee against the order of the High Court upholding addition under section 68 towards corpus donation received from companies …
