Category: Supreme Court
Supreme Court explains principles of Spousal, parental and filial consortium for award of compensation under Motor Vehicles Act ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2523 (2018) 09 SC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi (2017) 16 SCC 680 The Insurance Company had filed a Special Leave Petition (SLP) to …
When no substantial question of law was framed, High Court had no jurisdiction to examine the issue in its second appellate jurisdiction- Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2515 (2018) 09 SC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: Sanatosh Hazari vs. Purushottam Tiwari Surat Singh vs. Siri Bhagwan & Ors. The instant appeal was filed by the plaintiffs against the final judgment and order passed by the High Court in Second …
Presiding Officers of DRT entitled to benefit of increased age under section 6 of the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 – Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2507 (2018) 09 SC Petitioners in the instant petitions were appointed as Presiding Officers of Debt Recovery Tribunal …
Shocked Supreme Court fines Commissioner Income Tax with fine of Rs 10 lakhs for misleading statement about pendency of a civil appeal ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2495 (2018) 08 SC The instant Special Leave Petition (SLP) was filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax, Ghaziabad after a …
In application for setting aside arbitral award, cross examination / Trial of persons swearing to affidavits should not be allowed unless absolutely necessary – Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2479 (2018) 08 SC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: Indus Mobile Distribution Pvt. Ltd. v. Datawind Innovations …
Moratorium u/s 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 not apply to a personal guarantor of a corporate debtor – Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2467 (2018) 08 SC The instant appeal involved the question whether Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 …
Forfeiture of gratuity is not automatic on dismissal from service; it is subject to sub-Sections (5) and (6) of Section 4 of The Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. The Act must prevail over the Rules framed by the employer – Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2467 …
Jaypee Infratech Insolvency proceedings to continue at NCLT-We cannot be unmindful of interests of 92% of home buyers who preferred possession of homes-SC ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2460 (2018) 08 SC The instant writ had been filed under Article 32 of the Constitution for protecting the interests …
TDS 194C not applicable on payment by contractee to contractor of license fee. Supreme Court dismisses SLP of the Income Tax Department ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2444 (2018) 07 SC The respondent assessee was granted a contract by IRCTC for providing catering service for which the assessee …
Exemption notification should be interpreted strictly. Burden of proving applicability is on assessee who can not claim benefit of ambiguity-Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2443 (2018) 07 SC This Constitution Bench was setup to examine the correctness of the ratio in Sun Export Corporation (Sun Export Case). …
