CBDT notifies five sovereign wealth funds u/s 10(23FE)
The CBDT has notified the following five sovereign wealth fund under section 10(23FE) of the Income Tax Act 1961 (the Act) as the specified person for the purposes of the clause (vi) of clause (b) of the Explanation 1 to clause (23FE) of section 10 of the Act in respect of the investment made by it in India on or after the date publication of this notification in the Official Gazette but on or before the 31st day of March, 2024 subject to the fulfilment of the specified conditions:
| The Chiswick Investment Pte. Ltd | Notification No. 55/2021 dated 5th May 2021 |
| The Stretford Investment Pte. Ltd. | Notification No. 54/2021 dated 5th May 2021 |
| The Dagenham Investment Pte. Ltd | Notification No. 53/2021 dated 5th May 2021 |
| The Anahera Investment Pte. Ltd | Notification No. 52/2021 dated 5th May 2021 |
| The Bricklayers Investment Pte. Ltd | Notification No. 51/2021 dated 5th May 2021 |
Conditions to be fulfilled by Sovereign Wealth Fund
(i) the assessee shall file return of income, for all the relevant previous years falling within the period beginning from the date in which the said investment has been made and ending on the date on which such investment is liquidated, on or before the due date specified for furnishing the return of income under sub-section (1) of section 139 of the Act;
(ii) the assessee shall get its books of account audited for the previous years referred to in clause (i) by any accountant specified in the Explanation below sub-section (2) of section 288 of the Act and furnish the Audit Report in the format annexed as Annexure to this notification herewith at least one month prior to the due date specified for furnishing the return of income under sub-section (1) of section 139 of the Act;
(iii) the assessee shall furnish a quarterly statement within one month from the end of each quarter electronically in Form II as annexed to the Circular No 15 of 2020, dated the 22nd July, 2020 in respect of each investment made by it during the said quarter;
(iv) the assessee shall maintain a segmented account of income and expenditure in respect of such investment which qualifies for exemption under clause (23FE) of section 10 of the Act;
(v) the assessee shall continue to be owned and controlled, directly or indirectly, by the Government of Singapore and at no point of time any other person should have any ownership or control, directly or indirectly, in the assessee;
(vi) the assessee shall continue to be regulated under the law of the Government of Singapore;
(vii) the earnings of the assessee shall be credited either to the account of the Government of Singapore or to any other account designated by that Government so that no portion of the earnings inures to any private person barring any payment made to creditors or depositors for loan taken or borrowing [as defined in sub-clause (a) of clause (ii) of Explanation 2to clause (23FE) of section 10 of the Act] taken for the purposes other than for making investment in India;
(viii) the assessee shall not have any loans or borrowings [as defined in sub-clause (a) of clause (ii) of Explanation 2 to clause (23FE) of section 10 of the Act], directly or indirectly, for the purposes of making investment in India;
(ix) the asset of the assessee shall vest in the Government of Singapore upon dissolution barring any payment made to creditors or depositors for loan taken or borrowing for the purposes other than for making investment in India; and
(x) the assessee shall not participate in the day to day operations of investee [as defined in clause (i) of Explanation 2 to clause (23FE) of section 10 of the Act] but the monitoring mechanism to protect the investment with the investee including the right to appoint directors or executive director shall not be considered as participation in the day to day operations of the investee.
- Site expenses not accounted in books in expense ledger added as unexplained expenditure
- Special Court presided by a Sessions /Addl. Sessions Judge have jurisdiction under IBC 2016
- Revenue should not take the benefit of the mistake committed by the assessee
- Under NI Act if cheque signed by drawer is given to payee ’reverse onus clause’ u/s 139 attracted
- High Court grants bail to Income Tax Officer accused of demanding bribe of Rs. 25000/-
){kind=link}