Forfeiture of advance received on agreement to sale of property is capital receipt not income from other sources
ABCAUS Neutral Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 3691 (2023) (03) ITAT
Important Case Laws relied upon by parties:
Travencore Rubber & Tea Company Ltd. Vs. CIT (2000) 243 ITR 158 (SC)
CIT Vs. Meera Goyal (2014) 360 ITR 346 (Del)
CIT vs Kailas Rubber & Company Limited (1966) (60 ITR 435) (SC)
In the instant case, the Revenue had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in holding that amount forfeited out of agreement to sale was capital receipt.
The respondent assessee had entered into agreement to sale of property with a company for a sale consideration against which the assessee received advance sale consideration.
Since, the buyer failed to pay the balance sale consideration even after issuing legal notice, the assessee forfeited the advance money.
The AO brought to assess the amount forfeited as income from other sources invoking of Section 56(2)(vii) of the Act. The AO was of the opinion that Section 51 of the Income Tax Act provides for taxation of advance money forfeited to the extent of cost of acquisition/WDV of the property.
The AO was of the opinion that the taxability of excess money received by the assessee over and above the cost of acquisition/WDV is neither covered u/s 51 of the Act, nor covered under the head “salary” or “Profit & Gains of Business/Profession” and It cannot even be taxed under the head income from other sources u/s 56(2)(vii) of the Act.
Before the ITAT, the assessee submitted that it is well settled law that any amount received against the sale of “capital asset‟ is a “capital in nature‟ not a “revenue receipt‟, hence can be subjected to “capital gain‟ only and it cannot be taxed under the head “income from other sources”.
It was further submitted that the income from other sources‟ chargeable in Section 56(2)(ix) of the Act does not provide taxation of forfeited capital receipt till Assessment Year 2014-15.
The case of the Revenue was that excess money could not be taxed under the head “Capital Gain” as there were no transfer of any asset as contemplated u/s 2(47) of the Act, therefore, the same has to be taxed under the head “income from other sources” u/s 56(2)(ix) read with section 56(1) of the Act.
The ITAT opined that the assessee will not fall within the ambit of section 56(2) of the Act
The Tribunal pointed out that Supreme Court have held that any amount received against Sale of Capital Asset is a Capital Receipt and not a Revenue Receipt, hence can be subjected to Capital Gain only, it cannot be taxed under the head “income from other sources”. Income from other sources chargeable in section 56 of the Act does not provide taxation of forfeited capital receipt till AY 2014-15.
Further, the Supreme Court held that the amount forfeited referred only to the capital asset of the assessee and were directly related to the sale of such capital asset.
The ITAT further observed that Hon’ble High Court have observed that earnest money forfeited by the assessee as provided in the agreement to sell received from the purchaser, who failed to pay the ‘balance consideration is a capital receipt not liable to tax. Provisions of section 51 would come into play in these circumstances as it specifically covers this type of transaction, once the transaction had been held to be genuine, there is no question of the transaction being without any consideration so as to invoke provisions of section 56(2)(vi) of the Act.
Thus, we do not find any error/ infirmity in the approach of the CIT(A) in deleting the addition made by the AO and we find no merit in the Ground.
Accordingly, the ITAT dismissed the ground of the Appeal.
Download Full Judgment Click Here >>
- Cash deposit in demonetisation held exempt assessee being resident of Arunachal Pradesh
- ICAI bans seven Chartered Accountants being guilty of professional misconduct
- ITAT deleted addition made on presumption – there cannot be loss in restaurant business
- Rent of plot taxed as income from other sources in absence of proof of structure on it
- Application invited for special Public Prosecutors in Income Tax Department NER Region
