Penalty for fake invoice. New Section 271AAD. Penalty for false entry, etc. in books of account
With the launch of Goods & Services Tax (GST), several cases of fraudulent input tax credit (ITC) claim have been caught by the GST authorities. In these cases, fake invoices are obtained by suppliers registered under GST to
fraudulently claim ITC and reduce their GST liability.
These fake invoices are found to be issued by racketeers who do not actually carry on any business or profession. They only issue invoices without actually supplying any goods or services. The GST shown to have been charged on such invoices is neither paid nor is intended to be paid.
Such fraudulent arrangements have prompted harsher provisions under the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Penalty for fake invoice
Therefore, it is proposed to introduce a new section, namely section 271AAD in the Act to provide for a levy of penalty for false entry, etc. in books of account
Penalty shall be levied on a person, if it is found during any proceeding under the Act that in the books of accounts maintained by him there is a
(i) false entry or
(ii) any entry relevant for computation of total income of such person has been omitted to evade tax liability.
The penalty payable by such person shall be equal to the aggregate amount of false entries or omitted entry. It is also propose to provide that any other person, who causes in any manner a person to make or cause to make a false entry or omits or causes to omit any entry, shall also pay by way of penalty a sum which is equal to the aggregate amounts of such false entries or omitted entry.
The false entries is proposed to include use or intention to use –
(a) forged or falsified documents such as a false invoice or, in general, a false piece of documentary evidence; or
(b) invoice in respect of supply or receipt of goods or services or both issued by the person or any other person without actual supply or receipt of such goods or services or both; or
(c) invoice in respect of supply or receipt of goods or services or both to or from a person who do not exist.
This amendment will take effect from 1st April, 2020
- Whether AO applied his mind or not is question of fact not law – SC dismisses SLP of Department
- No Prohibition on travelling abroad if proceedings u/s 10 of Black Money Act initiated
- Partnership firms/companies not eligible to be a registered valuer if not member of RVO
- Challenged to IBC by a CA refused by Supreme Court for want of locus and bonafide.
- Date of initiation of penalty in assessment order is the relevant date u/s 275(1)(c) for limitation