Tag: income tax penalty
Under section 271AAB undisclosed income also means additional income due to bogus expense recorded in the books of accounts – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3820 (2023) (11) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon by parties:ACIT vs. Sri Mahender Kumar AgarwalCIT vs. Harjeev Aggarwal, 70 taxmann.com 95 Radhey …
No penalty u/s 271F as due to mistake of DDO wrong PAN was mentioned in 26AS and assessee was precluded from filing the return of income – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3808 (2023) (09) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by …
Only five days time allowed to reply questionnaire was not sufficient opportunity. ITAT deletes penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3786 (2023) (08) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax …
Penalty u/s 271B deleted as assessee was not aware that section 44AB related to Tax Audit was applicable to him as he was only a commission agent ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3757 (2023) (05) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the …
Penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) deleted as counsel misled by filing inaccurate return and not informed of assessment and penalty notices ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3750 (2023) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon:Triumph International Finance India Ltd vs DCIT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order …
Penalty u/s 271D initiated when assessee was alive but order invalid if passed in the name of assessee after his death ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3733 (2023) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon:ITO v. Bhupendra Bhikhalal Desai 131 taxmann.com 40 (SC)ITO vs. Durlabhbhai Kanubhai Rajpara 114 taxmann.com …
No penalty u/s 271C on mere delay in deposit of TDS after deduction – Supreme Court No penalty can be levied u/s 271C of the Income Tax Act 1961 on mere delay in deposit of TDS after its deduction – Supreme Court In a recent judgment, the Hon’ble …
Income Tax Penalty u/s 271AAB deleted as assessee was declaring income on presumptive basis, was not required to maintain books and addition was made on estimated basis. ABCAUS Neutral Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3680 (2023) (03) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by …
Assessing agriculture income as business income no basis for imposing penalty u/s 271A as it would not ipso facto lead to conclusion that assessee was aware of the requirement maintaining books of accounts u/s 44AA ABCAUS Neutral Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3677 (2023) (02) ITAT In the instant case, …
Delay in filing of Tax Audit Report due to computer data crash- Penalty u/s 271B quashed ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3673 (2023) (02) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre in confirming income tax penalty u/s 271B …
